DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?

Started Jan 23, 2020 | Discussions thread
maltmoose Veteran Member • Posts: 3,049
Re: The Comparison Photos Are Not Identical...
5

Bill Ferris wrote:

and the photos made by the higher end camera bodies (X-Pro3 and X-T30) look noticeably better when some basic processing is applied. This makes sense considering the less heavy-handed in-camera sharpening applied by the X-Pro3 and X-T30. The X-A5 and X-T100 both show significant ringing (bright halos) around high contrast details and more abrupt tonality changes. The X-A5 and X-T100 photos look good enough when viewed at screen resolution but when viewed at 1:1 in comparison with the X-Pro3 and X-T30 images, they're just not as good.

X-Pro3

X-T30

X-A5

X-T100

I'm not sure what you did but you made them all look worse to me.

The more i look at this the more it gets tiresome though, whether its bayer or xtrans i can take the same photos, but i would like a bayer sensor in an xe4 with tilt screen

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
JNR
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow