DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?

Started Jan 23, 2020 | Discussions thread
CAcreeks
CAcreeks Forum Pro • Posts: 18,940
Re: Results: X-AR+LR 6 outresolves X-pro3+Iridient
1

SpeedyNeo wrote:

getochkn wrote:

SpeedyNeo wrote:

getochkn wrote:

So the point is you can buy a camera that fits your budget, size requirements, viewfinder or not and take emotional, thought provoking images, OR obsess over a 2% crop of a single test image?

What's wrong with comparing AF speed between 2 different sensors from the same manufacturer?

Where is AF speed mentioned? This thread is super crops on a test scene pixel peeping between xtrans and bayer. Again.

Yeah, I know. The pixelpeeping part was over for me so I decided to start a new topic about AF speed

I agree that X-Trans and Bayer are comparable. Differences at 24 Mp are so minor that there's nothing in it. But that begs the question, why doesn't Fujifilm switch to Bayer?

Imaging-resource.com has not yet tested performance of the X-A7, but when they do, we will have a better idea of how the X-T200 will perform. Probably the same sensor and AF pixels.

Reviewers complained about slow AF and menus (!) in the X-T100, although owners in this forum did not object to AF speed. I'm sure it was better than those old Canon G2 cameras that took several seconds to focus.

If you want to complain about the X-T200, I suppose you could say the dial controls are not as photographer-friendly as on the X-T100, which had more of them, and a 4-way controller.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
JNR
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow