DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?

Started Jan 23, 2020 | Discussions thread
Canadianguy Senior Member • Posts: 2,910
Re: No longer comparing CFAs

Jim King wrote:

Canadianguy wrote:

So you are saying the X-Trans advantage held up across every converters out there? One would think - it didn't hold up for Adobe from all the complaints out there.

If it has all been done before - one would think a table of the results could be compiled.

I would envision a table with every piece of software out there with Bayer vs X-Trans results...

Adobe without enhanced detail - Bayer vs X-Tran

Adobe with enhanced detail - Bayer vs. X-Tran

Capture One - Bayer vs. X-Tran

Irident - Bayer vs. X-Tran

Luminar - Bayer vs X-Tran

Then one could decide for themselves based on the software they are using - which CFA would work best for them or if one has to switch software if one is already stuck on a particular CFA.

What happens to your conclusions when one of these cameras is updated? Your conclusions about which CFA is better would likely no longer be valid, I fear.

I have no idea but according to The Davinator - all this has been done many many times before with everything settled and concluded...I was just asking for the summary of results by software between Bayer and X-Trans. I am not sure if they did it for different cameras as well...

The Davinator:

"If we compare two different cameras in raw in Iridient...then it is a level playing field. Same if both are done in C1 or Lr. If we compare the results with numerous raw converters...and this has been done here many times...we have found that XTrans does have some advantages...mainly in Moire and noise"

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
JNR
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow