DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?

Started Jan 23, 2020 | Discussions thread
sluggy_warrior Veteran Member • Posts: 3,204
Re: Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?
1

HatWearingFool wrote:

But this is the second time today I've seen people talking about the extra processing power required for x-trans raws? Has anyone actually experienced a difference in system requirements for processing equivalently sized bayer and Fuji raw files? I've never noticed any speed difference between processing 24mb Sony bayer raws and 24mb Fuji x-trans raws. I'm really curious if this is a real thing?

You made me curious, so I ran "darktable -d perf" and exported two ISO6400 RAWs of X-T20 and X-T100 (from dpreview studio). They have identical history stack, except the X-T20 uses Markesteijn 3-pass and the X-T100 uses AMaZE (color smoothing 5 times, match green disabled).

LOL, the Markesteijn took half the time of AMaZE. I actually had to run it again two more times to confirm that I didn't make a mistake.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
JNR
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow