DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?

Started Jan 23, 2020 | Discussions thread
sluggy_warrior Veteran Member • Posts: 3,204
Re: Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?

SpeedyNeo wrote:

Yes --that's the argument Clive99 was proposing. What I'm saying is: what would a high end user lose from a little bit of in-camera sharpening? If nothing is lost, then they should apply the same parameters for both JPEG engines. Just my opinion (of course I could be wrong!)

Everything has pro and con, including sharpening, it's a matter of selecting the "right" balance. Too much and the image will look too unnatural, especially skin imperfections for portrait. And as I showed in my previous post, noise will be more visible with more sharpening, too.

I still have no idea how Fuji chose the default settings for different cameras. I guess they did the research and designed a camera with targeted market segments in mind, thus, the default settings are decided accordingly.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
JNR
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow