is the 15-35 worth it?

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
draacor
draacor Senior Member • Posts: 1,693
is the 15-35 worth it?

So i am in the process of testing out the eos R and comparing it to my Nikon Z7. But hypothetically speaking if i sold my Z7 and lenses and kept the EOS R, i would be left with the EOS R, 35mm f1.8 RF, 24-105 f4 RF. and about 2k in money dedicated to camera stuff. I do want a wide angle because a lot of what i shoot is landscapes, however do i really want to spent all 2k on one lens or should i opt for the 16-35 which can be significantly cheaper used? maybe even the II over the III? I would like to maybe get a couple of 1.4 primes, like the 50 or maybe a 1.8 85. Any thoughts? Is the 15-35 that much better?

-- hide signature --

Aaron Smith
Wolfe Photography
www.nvwolfe.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/finalimpact/

 draacor's gear list:draacor's gear list
Nikon D500 Canon EOS R Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM Nikon 200-500mm F5.6E ED VR +3 more
Nikon Z7
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow