One lens travel solution: 16-80 vs 18-135

Started Jan 19, 2020 | Polls thread
Martin_99 Senior Member • Posts: 1,514
Re: One lens travel solution: 16-80 vs 18-135
1

holashobby wrote:

I am looking at either the 16-80 and the 18-135 as a possible one lens solution for travel and casual photography. In your opinion, which one of these lenses is preferable for cityscapes, streets and non-critical landscape style shooting? I am minded to go with the 18-135 due to its longer reach and larger aperture at the wide end. However, I wonder how the 16-80 compares? which is your preference as a possible one lens travel solution and why?

Thanks for your comments

I'm sony user with 18-135 lens, so I will comment only generally: I sometimes miss the wider 16mm and never used f3.5 on wider end, so my vote was 16-80, which seems to be as very good compromise of focal range and apperture for travel lens.

 Martin_99's gear list:Martin_99's gear list
Sony a6400 Canon EOS RP Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow