Sony 16-55, 2.8 - so what's the verdict?

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
An avid reader
An avid reader Forum Member • Posts: 55
Sony 16-55, 2.8 - so what's the verdict?

Hey there,

I would like to know from the those who own this lens, whether it is worth the upgrade between the Sigma trio and the 18-135? The price is down to about 1.070 € in Amazon Spain.

I watched the Artur R video, but he did not mention the difference between 1.4 and 2.8.

I have the old sigma 30, 2.8 and I must say that indoors without a flash, the lens doesn't let in enough light. The sigma 30, 1.4 works fine for indoor.

The new sony lens seems great for events. But what about travelling? Would you prefer the 16-55 over the 18-135?

Thanks for your feedback...

 An avid reader's gear list:An avid reader's gear list
Sony a6300 Sony a6600 Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A Sigma 30mm F1.4 for Sony E +3 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow