I'm using an S110; your options
I have been looking up a cheap (~$200 USD) capable compact for every day use.... I came across the S120. I know it's older, but it seems to be about what I'm looking for: Pocketable, able to shoot RAW and can take some nice pictures.... I was wondering if anyone here is still using this camera and if they enjoy it. I wouldn't be using it for critical applications; I have two cameras for that. I just miss having a pocketable camera on me all the time.
Let me know your thoughts on this or if I would be better suited saving for something like a G9X or something.
I have, use, and like the previous model, the S110. I like it for the applications you mention: a pocketable, inexpensive, raw-capable camera with good enough image quality for casual, travel / vacation type pictures for prints up to 8x10 inches or so, depending on your standards. (I also have an older S95; more on the series below.)
The original Sony RX100 was introduced before both the S110 and S120, and in most ways it is a better camera than either (I've used one). However, the Canons (1) have usefully-wider lenses (24mm equivalent instead of 28mm equivalent), (2) have a touch-screen, which I and others find useful for specifying the focus point, and (3) are significantly cheaper as of today for comparable-condition used cameras.
I can't tell you whether you'd prefer an original RX100, and if so, whether you'd prefer it by enough to justify the extra cost.
And last and least, this Canon range (omitting the S90 and older, which are now more than a decade old):
S95: CCD sensor, 28-105mm equivalent f/2-4.9 lens (have one, my lens seems to have some alignment issue or something)
S100: CMOS sensor, first 24-120mm equivalent f/2-5.9 lens, many reports of lens performance / QC issues
S110: basically an S100 with the lens QC issues solved (have it, like it)
S120: BSI-CMOS sensor, 24-120mm equivalent f/1.8-5.7 lens