How is the Sigma 10-20mm?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
absquatulate Forum Pro • Posts: 11,128
Re: How is the Sigma 10-20mm?

Antone wrote:

Here's a shot at 10mm and f/8 with the f/4-5.6 version. You'll see the edges are not that good. You're unlikely to see meaningful improvement, and perhaps worse, performance from the f/3.5 version.

Notchtop Mountain, Rocky Mountain National Park

Anyone expecting perfect edges on any UWA lens is going to be disappointed, they're convex lenses with bulbous front elements, they're virtually impossibly to perfectly correct. The sensible thing to do, especially on a high resolution camera, is to shoot wider than you need and crop the edges wherever possible. This pretty much applies to all wider angle zooms in my experience. Ultimately the viewing distance dictates how important this is, and to be honest, no non photographer will ever notice what people on here agonise over. The 10-20mm, both versions, are excellent value for money and will do a sterling job. A quick check on Flickr, searching for this lens, will demonstrate that.

 absquatulate's gear list:absquatulate's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 Fujifilm FinePix X100 Nikon Coolpix P7800 Sigma sd Quattro Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
dlj
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow