What focal length for the most realistic pictures?

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Magnar W
OP Magnar W Senior Member • Posts: 4,385
Re: What focal length for the most realistic pictures?

fferreres wrote:

All, except maybe rectilinear ultra wides because we experience a field as mapping the image into a sphere (mental representation may not be a rectangular paper, which is why perspective, in drawing, needs to be taught, but you'd immediately know if something is done with a very wrong perspective).

May great painters make work with distorted perspective intentionally. It is not wrong, it is just different from what we are used with.

So FL is more about communicating distance to subject, where shorter FL will signal being close, and longer FL would signal not being close to the subject. If it's a beautiful model, a shorter FL may create more intimacy feeling, and if it's a long FL, would create more distance and reduce any effect of perspective.

Sure, for triggering emotions. But in this respect focus length is NOT used for realism, but to strengthen the story that is told.

 Magnar W's gear list:Magnar W's gear list
Sony a7 Sony a7R III Sony FE 90mm F2.8 macro Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8 Zeiss Loxia 35 +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow