Sony A7II or Fuji X-T2 (also, FF or APS-C, IBIS or not)

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
OP Eugleo Junior Member • Posts: 45
Re: Sony A7II or Fuji X-T2 (also, FF or APS-C, IBIS or not)

JpGomez wrote:

Eugleo wrote:

JpGomez wrote:

Eugleo wrote:

A7II pros over XT-2

  • FF (better for nice DOF and low-light photography)

Reason why I jumped from APS-C to full frame.

It’s hard to quantify this one, though. I don’t plan to shoot some super low-light photos, not very ofter, at least. However, I heard that FF usually buys you around a stop of light, the lens spec being the same, and IBIS might buy you some more, if you are shooting stills. That might mean that given there is only X of light or less, ISO 100 for Sony should really be compared with ISO 800 on Fuji — and now there they might be some IQ differences as well.

My comment was based from my experience comparing APS-C and FF, from my trusty a65 crop to a7 fullframe. ISO6400 was not useable with the previous but acceptable with latter. Fast forward to a7iii these new cameras shoots cleaner HI-ISO.

It put a smile on my face with the first low light image I took with the a7 (where I know a65 struggled), to me that all that matters. Your useage maybe different. Low light IQ was my priority at that time.

Oh yeah, I’m glad you speak from personal experience. It’s just that I don’t know what do you mean by the “low-light” (i.e. how low? Cloudy day? Midnight city?), just like I don’t really know what I can expect from ISO 6400 (how often does one use that? For what occasions?).

I can't comment on newer APS-C but pretty sure high ISO has improved with new sensor tech. You should look into those as well.

The question is, how big is this X? When does the IBIS and FF start to noticeably matter? Cloudy day? Then it’s significant. Night-sky photography? Then I don’t care. Where do you think the borderline is?

  • IBIS
  • can adapt good old lenses (as I don't mind MF for my use cases)

XT-2 pros over A7II

  • IQ allegedly basically the same as A7II or better
  • great build quality
  • great handling
  • ... basically everything else is better or on-par compared to A7II

I give it to Fuji, their design is really good.

There's four things that keep me from buying XT-2 straight away

  • I don't know anything about Fuji lenses (are there any cheap ones out there, so I can have a nice range of focal lengths before finding out what I need and like)?

This one you need to research on, I don't shoot Fuji, but I think the price of their APS-C lens are up there like Sony full frame lens. (I maybe wrong)

There are some pretty good lenses for around 400$ new, mostly some fast, quality primes — the zooms are noticeably more expensive, though. I also heard there are some 3rd larty oprions for Fuji as well, but haven’t checked it out, yet.

Also 3rd party are flocking e-mount full frame system. There are well priced FF lenses from Tamron & Samyang that fit the bill, and Sigma is also pushing quality lenses directly competing with Sony GM for fraction of cost. Lots of option out there.

Another thing, if you can wait to save and shell out for an a7III, It'll be worth than a7II.

I can’t justify spending so much on a hobby I might drop next year... Maybe once the prices drop, but not now.

If you don't really need to upgrade now, then it will be worth your while to wait. Prices all go down eventually. And you will get your $$$ worth on the 3rd gen Sony or Fuji with the best lowest price whichever you decide. I patiently acquired my gears always with either discount/markdown/used, nothing wrong that.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow