From A6300 to A6600. Is it worth it?

Started 4 days ago | Discussions thread
MarkG Regular Member • Posts: 283
Agree 100%

Black Elk wrote:

From the OP: I shoot mainly static architectural and only RAW.

Based on this there is absolutely no need to "upgrade" to the a6600. The sensors are the same and only a pixel peeper could tell the difference. IMHO, the OP will not see improvement in the type of pictures taken. No need to spend a thousand plus dollars for a bunch of whistles and bells that are not needed.

Completely agree. For architecture, no advantage in a6600 IQ over a6300 whatsoever.

Sports, animal photography etc. is a different story.

 MarkG's gear list:MarkG's gear list
Ricoh GR Sony RX100 VI Sony a7S Sony a6300 Canon EOS M50 +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow