Medium Format vs. Full Frame Locked

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
Teila Day
Teila Day Veteran Member • Posts: 4,963
Re: MF vs. FF + + +

Macro guy wrote:

thebbqguy wrote:

I can afford the digital route suggested in this thread, but my logical side prevents me from jumping in with both feet at this time.

I have really been trying to focus on the actual cost per pixel. If printing smaller sizes, the cost with cheap digital cameras is quite low. But its printing bigger sizes that cause costs to rise significantly.

But I know next to nothing about film.

It's pretty straightforward: The cost of printing film = The cost of printing digital + cost of film + cost of processing + cost of scanning.

+ the cost of any travel associated with transporting film/prints + the cost associated with the shipping of film/prints.

When it comes to MF vs. FF ... Marco is right on the money.

Best in photography to all of you

-- hide signature --
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
rbf
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow