GFX 100 vs a7RIV landscape IQ Locked

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
Erik Kaffehr
Erik Kaffehr Veteran Member • Posts: 3,582
Re: GFX 100 vs a7RIV landscape IQ

JimKasson wrote:

I did a series of test shots with the GXF 100 and the a7RIV aimed as showing the relative image quality in a typical landscape situation. I used the Fuji 110/2 on the GFX 100 and the Otus 85/1.4, at equivalent apertures that are the most common for landscape use. As I'm sure most of you know, the resolution differences between prints for the two cameras will essentially go away if you stop down far enough. However, I can tell you that that is nowhere near the at the common landscape apertures.

Pictures and the details of the test are here:

https://blog.kasson.com/gfx-100/a7riv-vs-gfx-100-for-landscapes/

Jim

Hi Jim,

Very good demo!

How much of that difference is due to the GFX 100 having more pixels?

My question is obviously irrelevant, one of the main reasons to buy the GFX 100 is probably that it has more pixels. But it may still be an interesting question?

Best regards

Erik

-- hide signature --

Erik Kaffehr
Website: http://echophoto.dnsalias.net
Magic uses to disappear in controlled experiments…
Gallery: http://echophoto.smugmug.com
Articles: http://echophoto.dnsalias.net/ekr/index.php/photoarticles

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
rbf
rbf
rbf
rbf
rbf
tex
rbf
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow