Algorithm that removes the water from underwater images

kelpdiver wrote:

Joep van Steen wrote:

Sure. First you want the paper, I link to and it, and now you want more. Dr. Dino tactics. I'm done with this.

it's less clear what you want out of this thread.

Blind acceptance? Praise for posting a link as a "discoverer" of something that's had remarkably good press?

Not sure how long you've been around the block, but a white paper != a viable tool to add to your workflow. There's not even a non viable tool yet. Just a maybe.

Ah, now you want my motives. First you already doubted the researcher's.

All it is, is I read an article, noticed later there's an underwater photography sub forum, and decided it may be interesting enough to post a link.

If you say something that's incorrect then I may respond to that. If something is incorrect then it is that, incorrect, and how long I have been around the block is moot.

However first you say it's similar to taking sand as a point for WB, and that's simply not correct. Even if you could accomplish more or less the same by accident using Photoshop and whatnot, it still does not make it the same. It only illustrates you're missing the point.

Then you also say you wait for the paper then I give you the paper. Which still isn't good enough (don't ask for it then). Now you want before and after shots. A ready to use tool. That fits your workflow. Well, good for you, all I did was post a link I deemed to be interesting, period. And all I did was respond to your incorrect assumptions made on a dentist's chair. Sure you decide how useful it is to you. I'm not telling you what to do.

Click me to see before / after Sea Thru