RF 70-200F2.8L specs leaked

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Bhotoz Senior Member • Posts: 1,073
Re: RF 70-200F2.8L specs leaked

Abu Mahendra wrote:

dmanthree wrote:

shawnphoto wrote:

dmanthree wrote:

Abu Mahendra wrote:

Landscapers, I reckon, would appreciate a RF12-24/4. I would appreciate a RF100-300/4IS.

I'd buy both of them in a heartbeat.

Why would Canon make a 12-24 when they already make an 11-24 for EF?

What a strange question! They'd make it for the same reason they're making an RF 24-70, 70-200, and 24-105: because the new mount allows them to produce better lenses! Taking your logic one step further, why bother to make RF lenses at all?

The logic is strange indeed. The other questionable bit is the rejection that f/4 lenses make sense. In fact, with the ever increasing low-light sensitivity of sensors, slower lenses make ever increasing sense.

I think it's great we (will) have choices. Some want smallish and light f4-zooms, some a bit brighter f2.8-zooms and some like those enormous f2-zooms. Pick the poison you want and can afford!

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow