Is more than 16mp really needed for portraits ???

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
lickity split
lickity split Veteran Member • Posts: 5,565
Is more than 16mp really needed for portraits ???
16

It just seems that using a 36-46 mp camera I was always worried about showing to many blemishes with a lot more editing time required, with 16mp it just seems like the nefs require a few slight touches and there done.....

-- hide signature --

“Perhaps if you removed some clothing .”
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lickitysplit11111/

 lickity split's gear list:lickity split's gear list
Nikon D4S Nikon D850 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D ED-IF +12 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow