Is it worth getting an OG Canon EOS-M

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
keeponkeepingon Senior Member • Posts: 1,545
Re: Is it worth getting an OG Canon EOS-M

michoristo wrote:

The original M is absolute garbage. I had one and it was practically unusable unless you were shooting a static subject in bright light. The autofocus is sooooooooo slow that it was impossible to use. Low light? forget about it.

Did you update the firmware?  If I recall correctly there was an update that improved tings a little. 
I wouldn't call it "absolute garbage" especially compared to what else was available for that price at that time (I got a "fire sale" M and adapters).
Using the M "back in the day" I managed to get a lot of "keepers" even of stuff in motion including kids running around.  Some of this was luck and some of this was just a lot of experience using bad cameras.
Yeah low-light was not great but neither was low-light on my DSLR I had at the time.  There is an AF assist lamp on the M that for close things worked OK in low light but a large lens could mess it up.

 keeponkeepingon's gear list:keeponkeepingon's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS M Sony a6000 Sony a5100 +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
Joo
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow