Is it worth getting an OG Canon EOS-M

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
KEG Senior Member • Posts: 2,993
Re: Is it worth getting an OG Canon EOS-M

nnowak wrote:

michoristo wrote:

The original M is absolute garbage. I had one and it was practically unusable unless you were shooting a static subject in bright light. The autofocus is sooooooooo slow that it was impossible to use. Low light? forget about it.

And yet it still worked better than the M3.

On the other hand it was extremely well built. With the M6Mkii, I'm finally willing to get back into the EosM system, hopefully it wont let me down.

Here are two of mine from M3.

The only difference between it and M6/M50 is that  the color response different and 22/2.0 works better on M6/M50 and af is faster on M6/M50.

-- hide signature --


 KEG's gear list:KEG's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 Fujifilm X-T1 Canon EOS M3 Canon EOS M6 Canon EOS M50 +15 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow