RF 70-200F2.8L specs leaked

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Sittatunga Senior Member • Posts: 1,532
Re: RF 70-200F2.8L specs leaked

Peter Kwok wrote:

Yes, significantly lighter than all EF versions.

Sigh... it is still too heavy for me. Waiting for similar weight reduction on a F4 version.

It sounds if the EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM is too heavy for you as well.

That lens plus the basic EF adapter is only 188g lighter than the weight quoted for the RF lens. That's 6½ ounces in Imperial units, nearly the weight of a PowerShot S95 or G9 X. it's a lot cheaper and it also had 5 stops' worth of IS but it's still missing out on a stops' worth of movement reduction and/or depth of field restriction.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow