Is there a need for F1.4 lenses....

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
XeroJay Senior Member • Posts: 2,310
Re: Is there a need for F1.4 lenses....

DenImage wrote:

XeroJay wrote:

DenImage wrote:

"Was there ever really a need for this stupid article?"


Was there ever really a need for this type of response?


Yes, I felt the need. Since we're now all here taking the bait, and discussing a moot point, yes there was a need to point out the the entire premise of the article was indeed, stupid. Yet here we are, putting forth our arguments as if there's actually anything to debate.

By asking if there's really a need for a premium option, the article set the state up for stupid-talk.

If what you've written above is true, why bother posting a response in this thread?

Why didn't you just ignore the thread and move on?


Because just like the want vs need issue of fast primes; I may not need to engage in a stupid discussion, but maybe it's something that I wanted to do

 XeroJay's gear list:XeroJay's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Sony a9 Sony a7 III Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow