DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

To stack or not to stack

Started Sep 26, 2019 | Polls thread
John K Veteran Member • Posts: 9,870
Re: Larger DOF with larger sensors (not a typo)

gardenersassistant wrote:

Small sensors do not work especially well for depth of field because you typically can't use as large f-numbers with small sensor cameras as with cameras with larger sensors, so the end result is that you typically can't get more depth of field with a small sensor.

I think that you are I are kinda arguing the same point but from different angles. Where a small sensor is concerned I'm not trying to match the magnification of a DSLR. But I do want to use a smaller sensor because it's easier to fill the frame at much lower magnifications than using a DSLR. The fact that the fixed lens in that small frame sensor camera can't match the Fstops of a standard DSLR macro lens doesn't matter, I don't need a high Fstop to get a lot of depth of field if I'm not even shooting close to 1/3 life size...

To get the subject framing that I want with a DSLR requires me to be shooting at 1x or higher magnification, where the depth is gonna be pretty thin even at F11. With a tiny sensor I can get the same subject framing but in reality the resulting photo will be a closeup (not macro) because I don't need to project a 1:1 scale image, or higher, of the subject onto that tiny sensor...

-- hide signature --

Also known as Dalantech
My Book: http://nocroppingzone.blogspot.com/2010/01/extreme-macro-art-of-patience.html
My Blog: http://www.extrememacro.com
My gallery: http://www.johnkimbler.com
Macro Tutorials: http://dalantech.deviantart.com/gallery/4122501/Tutorials
Always minimal post processing and no cropping -unless you count the viewfinder...

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow