The AFMA myth.

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
ASR45 Forum Pro • Posts: 37,115
Re: The AFMA myth.

Distinctly Average wrote:

It amazes me that time after time users of this and other forums suggest AFMA based on little or no evidence that it is needed. Users see a shot that is soft, or completely missed focus and instantly tell the OP that AFMA is required. Some fail to even understand the “M” in AFMA stands for”Micro” and not massive. Even when the focus was off by meters, people still sat “do AMFA on all your lenses”. Sometimes they do not even ask if the shot was taken through the viewfinder or using live view.

To me the above is bad advice. Firstly it is just not possible from a single shot taken out and about that AFMA is required. That can only be done with some proper testing. Next it often misses any diagnosis of what may or may not be wrong with an image. It happens all the time on these forums. I have even seen it given as advice then it was plainly obvious the softness was caused by motion blur.

For most users, especially if they are using Canon glass on their Canon bodies, AFMA is not required. Canon have even said in the past it is a bandage and not a permanent fix. AFMA is a good tool to have, but not something to be relied upon, nor something to fiddle with based on flimsy evidence. In a lot of cases it can confuse the user even more, especially those with little DSLR experience. The adjustments only make a few mm difference in the focus point, but this can be enough to make things look terrible. I know one chap who returned his camera three times for service and each time was told nothing was wrong but given a new body as a good Will gesture. It was only when someone (a Nikon rep, this was a Nikon camera) sat down with him for a few hundred shots that it was realised the AFMA advice coupled with his lack of knowledge that was causing the problem. The guy was ready to switch brands but is now a happy Nikon user, and his AFMA is set to zero on all his lenses.

I firmly believe we should only suggest AFMA after a lot of questions have been asked and some proper testing has been done. It is not the panacea it is made out to be.

Canon do have a good guide on AFMA - but I do think it should start with a bit more info regarding when and why.

In all the years i have been shooting with canon lens, never needed it, if it aint broke dont fix it, as for third party lens i cannot say, i dont use them.

-- hide signature --

Great photography is about depth of feeling, not depth of field.
- Peter Adams
Believe in Karma.

 ASR45's gear list:ASR45's gear list
Canon EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS II Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon 6D Mark II Nikon AF Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED VR Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM +9 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow