What’s in your trinity?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
OP JEasley Forum Member • Posts: 96
Re: What’s in your trinity?

Tannin wrote:

600/4 II

100-400 II

24-105/4 Mark I

The competent but unexciting 24-105 doesn't belong in that august company, but it's the lens I have and the Mark II is apparently no real improvement. I believe the new RF 24-105 is much better, but there aren't any bodies for it good enough to make me want to swap. (I have an EOS R, and mostly use it with the 24-104, but although it has many strengths, it's not half the all-round performer the 5D IV is, and in some ways inferior to the ancient 5D II. So no RF lenses for me. Not until there is an R body good enough to deserve them.)

I have a variety of other lenses, but those three account for more than 90% of my use, and the excellent 16-35/4 much of the remainder.

From some reviewers, Kai specifically, they proclaimed it to be the best mid range zoom in the ef system.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow