Horrible shame for nikon Locked

Started 2 months ago | User reviews thread
This thread is locked.
Leonard Shepherd
Leonard Shepherd Forum Pro • Posts: 18,006
Re: Horrible shame for nikon

bflood wrote:

The major problem I find when I read a negative review of a long lens posted by someone I don't know is that I have absolutely no way to knowing if the lens is, in fact, a poor performer, or if the reviewer doesn't have the specialized skills needed to produce sharp images using a very long lens.

So when you want to tell people that you claim the Nikon 600 f4 lens is no good, you should post 1) some evidence that the lens is inadequate, AND 2) some evidence that you can shoot with a lens that long and get good results.

Otherwise, you leave the readers of this forum to guess, and that will become a competition between your reputation as a skilled photographer versus the reputation of the Nikon 600 f4. You probably won't win that one.

+1

-- hide signature --

Leonard Shepherd
In lots of ways good photography is much more about how equipment is used rather than the equipment being used.

 Leonard Shepherd's gear list:Leonard Shepherd's gear list
Nikon D810 Nikon D7200 Nikon D500 Nikon D850 Nikon Z7 +25 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow