DXO: m4/3 vs. FF -- we have it good!

Started Sep 4, 2019 | Discussions thread
Aaron801 Veteran Member • Posts: 6,497
Re: What you are saying is...
1

Gnine wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

where I do see a problem is the last sentence where you mention bigger, heavier and priced For some models and a range of focal lengths, that’s not quite the case This is unfortunate but it’s the train both Olympus and Panasonic have chosen

They've only gone that route, because the small/light/cheaper -and better quality options as well, are already nicely covered. If all you want is new and shiny, then right at this minute, new and shiny means bigger. But, and it's a big but, we have options. Lots and lots of options. Way more than any Canikon have to offer in mirrorless at the moment.

No doubt, the fact that there are so many options for m43 ought to be considered an advantage, not a problem. Just because you can buy some really heavy and expensive bodies and lenses doesn't mean that you have to do that, right? The fact is, that folks who want a really lightweight system and one that costs far less than pretty much any contemporary FF system can do that... and the actually IQ that one will get with such gear isn't to much different the the heaviest and most expensive.

-- hide signature --

my flickr:
www.flickr.com/photos/128435329@N08/

 Aaron801's gear list:Aaron801's gear list
Olympus PEN-F Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 Fisheye Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-150mm F4-5.6 ASPH Mega OIS +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
NCV
NCV
NCV
NCV
NCV
NCV
NCV
NCV
NCV
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow