90D. Well that’s disappointing for us 7D2 users

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
John Sheehy Forum Pro • Posts: 22,168
Re: 90D. Well that’s disappointing for us 7D2 users

John Sheehy wrote:

TheBlackGrouse wrote:

The downside, a more expensive successor of the 7DII, the good thing is that you don't need an extra body for wide-angle (for instance landscape) photography.

The problem is, there might not be enough people in the market who realize that a ~32.5MP Canon APS-C DSLR with better-than-1DxII AF is useful, and are willing to pay big bucks for it. The masses are hypnotized by pixel level view sharpness and noise, or the noise of normalized images at the same ISO, which often has no practical meaning.

I'd pay big bucks in a heartbeat for such a camera, especially if read noise at the pixel level was like the 20MP m43 sensors, or close to it.

I could buy an E-M1x and use an adapter, but mirrorless and translated AF protocols are not what I am looking for right now in a bird camera.

Sorry, I had the wrong numbers in mind for the 20MP m43 read noise when I implied that it had a lot less than the 90D.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow