Is there life after aperture block failure?

Massao wrote:

peterpainter wrote:

Massao wrote:

peterpainter wrote:

Thanks - yes, will keep an eye out for one. I'm sure I'd survive without focus-peaking if I had to!

Focus peaking is particularly useful with a camera with tilting/articulating screen. However, focus confirmation via OVF is much more accurate (though only works with center AF point..at least on my K-30).

I'm not entirely convinced by focus confirmation through the OVF. Admittedly that is based on my use a long time ago of an F1.8 lens which has a very narrow DOF at f1.8 but the focus confirmation on my old MZ50 gave it a much wider range. More modern gear may be better, but I don't think that focus points are accurate enough for very wide apertures, although I'd be happy to be corrected here.

I guess the technology as changed a lot. This could be model-dependent issue, but in K-30 I find the focus confirmation in OVF much more reliable then focus peaking.

How can focus peaking be unreliable or not accurate? It's the users fault if you don't get it right and not the camera. I was using focus peaking on Monday on a steep pebble beach with the K-70 flippy screen and checked with magnification all points of the frame for focus, needless to say the images were exactly as seen on the viewfinder.

BTW I couldn't have got the shots as good without the flippy screen and magnified focus peaking, therefore using old cameras without fully articulated screens nor focus peaking would have been a handicap resulting in lesser pleasing images. These are features which you have to use first to really understand, appreciate and use them to good effect going by my own experience and I'm not the first to jump at new tech.

Focus peaking is obviously designed for static or very slow moving objects (I remember doing snail macros 😁)

😎