Tamron 35-150 f2.8-f4 vs canon 24-240f4-6.3

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Noogy
Noogy Senior Member • Posts: 2,671
Re: Tamron 35-150 vs RF24-105mm

Bhotoz wrote:

Thanks for the pics. It's hard to say much about sharpness between these lenses, because there is such a small area in focus. It would also be good to use the same body when possible. Were you using tripod?

So how do you find RF didn't exceed your expectations, but Tamron did? What were you expecting more from RF?

How does the Tamron feel adapted to R, is it front heavy?

The easy question first. It feels well balanced with the R and slightly front heavy with RP.

From 35 to 50mm, its output is as good as a 2.8 prime lens. In that regard, it's better than the RF24-105mm which is a constant f4 lens. Overall sharpness at f4 is better from center to corner. Subjectively it yields a more three dimensional image quality where the RF24-105 images would sometimes look flat.

-- hide signature --

"Photography is therapeutic."
https://500px.com/joshcruzphotos

 Noogy's gear list:Noogy's gear list
Canon EOS M5 Canon EOS R Canon EOS RP Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM +9 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow