Animal Eye AF

Started 3 months ago | Questions thread
tbcass Forum Pro • Posts: 43,602
Re: Animal Eye AF

J A C S wrote:

tbcass wrote:

Just a thought but maybe you are satisfied with what you have because you have never used anything better?

You moved the goalposts. First, I replied to a rude poster who called Canon's Eye AF a "so-called" one. It is not "so-called" and even when it is not so-called, it still works as an Eye AF. Second, if what I have is perfect for my needs, it cannot be possibly "better". Maybe I am satisfied because, well, I am, and it just works?

My point was just because you have something that works for you doesn’t mean something better doesn’t exist. Sometimes we have to look outside the box.

-- hide signature --


 tbcass's gear list:tbcass's gear list
Sony RX100 Sony RX10 IV Sony a99 II Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Sony DT 35mm F1.8 SAM +10 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow