Travel, DSLR, Mirrorless, Weight and Cost = Conundrum.

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
calson Veteran Member • Posts: 9,751
Re: Travel, DSLR, Mirrorless, Weight and Cost = Conundrum.
2

I have the 14-24mm f/2.8 and it is an incredible lens but also very heavy and bulky and filter holders also add to the bulk. I bought the Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5G zoom lens which takes the usual 77mm size filters and it is what I use when I need to lighten my load. This lens is sharper than the Nikon 16-35mm f/4 lens as well as lighter.

A lens that is surprisingly good but slow at f/5.6 is the Nikon 28-300mm lens. For an ultra light FX kit I take this lens along with the 18-35mm and the Sigma 24-105mm f/4 IS.

A lighter option to the Sigma is the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 that sells new for only $499 and provides excellent IQ and autofocus performance. Unfortunately the Tamron takes a 67mm filter.

-- hide signature --

Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed. -- Herman Melville

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow