E-M1X should have been an E-M1III with 30mp instead

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
LoneTree1 Contributing Member • Posts: 922
E-M1X should have been an E-M1III with 30mp instead
3

Olympus tried this pro approach before, with the E-3 and E-5 and nothing much came of it.  But a 30mp sensor would have broken out of the mold m4/3rds has been in for quite some time.  No, it wouldn't have been able to keep-up with the ISO capability of the 20mp sensor, but for those want to utilize  the pro lenses to their best effect and gain more detail, it would have been better.  Also, the E-M1II despite it's small size is already pro-ish as it is.  Water resistant to a  great degree and tough.  It's not that hard to turn a camera sideways and shoot if you want portrait mode, you don't need a grip on the bottom.

Olympus E-3 Olympus E-5
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow