JPG vs RAW for example ISO 100

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Gary3000 Senior Member • Posts: 1,133
Re: JPG vs RAW for example ISO 100

sybersitizen wrote:

a6300 wrote:

Noise is bigger in raw, it seems that jpg is smoother. RAW files without noise reduction applied.

Why would you compare a JPEG image with noise reduction applied against a RAW image without noise reduction applied? If you want to reduce the appearance of noise in a RAW image, apply noise reduction to it. Also apply sharpening because JPEGs are almost always sharpened in the camera.

agreed.   RAW images are meant to be post-processed, Just at they're post-processed in camera to produce the JPEGs.

If you've got the time, (and a decent editing app),  RAW will always produce a superior image 100% of the time.

 Gary3000's gear list:Gary3000's gear list
Sony RX100 V Canon EOS 5D Mark II Sony a6500 Canon PowerShot G12 Canon PowerShot S110 +13 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow