Extenders: does brand really matter?
Re: Extenders: does brand really matter?
c h u n k wrote:
gardenersassistant wrote:
c h u n k wrote:
stevendillonphoto wrote:
I have the Kenko, but I don't use them much. I did an entire session with the 36mm last year, but it caused a good bit of vignetting that I didn't care for. I got a 500D this year and I'd much rather use that over a tube because 1) there is no light loss and 2) no vignetting.
The "light loss" is a non issue because its due to the effective fstop changing. There is no difference with tubes vs closeups for light relative to fstop...or very little.
for the avoidance of doubt (I know it is implied by the previous sentence, but it might not be obvious to everyone): "There is no difference with tubes vs closeups for light relative to effective fstop...or very little".
And the effective f-stop increases as you add tubes, but doesn't increase with a close-up lens. (I've never been able to find definitive documentation of this, but my experiments have been consistent with it being true, or as nearly true as my comparisons can't distinguish otherwise.)
Correct. So just change the Fstop on the camera. Bam. Problem fixed.
As long as you have the f-stops available. As you will know, but others may not, as magnification increases past a certain point (which depends on the kit being used) you can get a smaller effective aperture (with the accompanying larger depth of field but greater loss of light) with macro lenses/tubes etc than with close-up lenses.
This can of course have consequences that may seem counter-intuitive. For example, people often associate large depth of field with small sensors, but with for example an MPE-65 from 2:1 up wards I could get greater depth of field with a full frame camera than I could with my 1/2.3" sensor bridge cameras using close-up lenses to frame the same scene size (even though the MPE-65 only goes down to f/16 while the bridge cameras go to f/45 full frame equivalent). With the MPE-65 on APS-C I could get greater depth of field from 1:1 upwards than with my small sensor bridge cameras, and at less magnification than that with a macro lens that goes to f/22, and at any magnification with an f/22 macro lens on micro four thirds.
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
1 |
|
|
|
Jul 1, 2019
|
1 |
|
|
|
Jul 1, 2019
|
2 |
|
|
|
Jul 4, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9, 2019
|
2 |
|
|
|
Jul 10, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 10, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9, 2019
|
1 |
|
|
|
Jul 10, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 10, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 10, 2019
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Holy Stone produces dozens of low-cost drone models aimed at consumers. We look at the HS710 and HS175D to see if they stack up to other sub-250g offerings. Are these secretly great or more like toys?
It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good?
After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts.
The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. We think it rises to the challenge.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.