Travel, DSLR, Mirrorless, Weight and Cost = Conundrum.

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
toomanycanons Forum Pro • Posts: 12,782
Re: Travel, DSLR, Mirrorless, Weight and Cost = Conundrum.
4

PHXAZCRAIG wrote:

Andy Currie wrote:

I have the same issue of weight/quality versus output and a need to stay with Nikon, despite the pull of jumping to Fuji.

2 years ago I travelled to Hong Kong, Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore. My main lens was a 24-120 - and almost everything past 100mm was unusable... soft as butter in the corners. This year I'm doing HK to Japan and I have spent months on honing my travel kit and have ended up with the following:

18-35 G - lightweight, wide, tack sharp - the ideal street lens.

Why is the 18-35 a better choice than the much wider 16-35?

Lighter, cheaper, who needs 16 anyway, who needs VR on a wide angle, and...wait for it...the 18-35 is sharper than the 16-35.

"Much wider" is not necessarily a good thing nor accurate.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow