ISO 100, OMD-EM1II and firmware 3.0?

Started 2 months ago | Questions thread
spike29 Senior Member • Posts: 1,697
Re: Basics of digital camera ISO

bobn2 wrote:

Architeuthis wrote:

Chris Noble wrote:

Native vs. extended. Extended is not just at the top and bottom: In Panasonic cameras, the 1 eV ISO steps are native (analog steps) and the 1/3 and 2/3 steps between them are extended (analog + digital).


What do you mean with "digital"? Postprocessing of the already digitized information (=digital multiplication of the digital number delivered by the A/D converter with 1,33 and 1,67)? Or does the digitalization range of the A/D converter change (e.g., when maximum intensity readout would be e.g. 5V: from 0V to 5V it would change to 0V to 5-2.5/3=4.17V (+1/3 EV) or 0V to 5-2.5*2/3=to 3.33V).

I think this statement illustrates well why Chris' definitions of 'native' and 'extended' isn't a very good one. He's about the only person I know of who would think of the 'in-between' ISO settings as 'extended', and in fact, it's a very odd usage of the word 'extended'. They don't 'extend' the ISO range, they fill it in.

His example is entirely spurious, because you don't know (or care) what are the internal voltages used within the camera - and actually his example is completely unrealistic, no camera would be using a voltage as high as 5V for 'full scale', it simply requires too much power to drive a signal to 5V at the speeds required (I know old fashioned logic used to work with a 5V signal, but that just has to be 'on' or 'off', so the precision of the control doesn't matter too much), generally the voltages used are around a volt or so. But really, for the photographer, it's irrelevant. People who have believed the 'ISO is gain' calumny tend to concentrate on voltages, because they think that's what it's about.

Maybe someone could open a separate tread on ISO and working principles of the MFT sensors and at the end we all know exactly how the sensor is working

ISO setting is independent of the sensor.

Ah now I see from where some of the problems arise: in this definition the sensor is just the photoactive surface, while for others the sensor is the entire arrangement up to the digital numbers delivered...

That's a common problem in this discussion, although also an irrelevance. When you realise what the photographic process is, and what ISO actually does, you realise that whilst where the sensor starts and stops is of academic interest, it's irrelevant to the discussion. ISO says what lightness should result from a given exposure.

This is one of the clearest , most understandable short definitions i read about this subject .🙂

Simplified but accurate enough.

To determine the lightness in the output file, all the camera needs to be able to do is measure the exposure in each pixel. 'Gain' doesn't change the exposure in the pixel, but it can change how accurately it is measured.

Is this the reason that dynamic range changes when ISO raises?  less accurately means less steps between  black and white (full exposure)

People have difficulty with this concept because they tend to call both the input and output 'exposure', in which case they think of 'gain' as giving a bigger 'exposure' from a smaller one, but that is not what is happening. Exposure and lightness are different things, which is why two words are needed.

Extended ISO at the high end i can think of: Just add measurement's at the lowest part of the sensor output voltages until noise overgrows mesurable signal and higher iso values are redicules because you can't separate random noise from the actual latent image capturing enough to get a reasonable clear image at the end anymore.

But at the low end below base iso. Why don't use that as base iso?

More then enough light to "fill" pixels at base iso so when extend to a lower iso, you get some longer ss and or smaller diafragma at the cost of what?

(Sorry to bump in but this is interesting, most things i read is that extended iso at the low end is extended dynamic range , so less overexposed pixels.)

-- hide signature --

knowledge is addictive, every time i get some i want more.....
(If i can remember 1/1000 of everything i learned/read in the past i will be happy as a monky with........)

 spike29's gear list:spike29's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Panasonic G85 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-140mm F3.5-5.6 O.I.S Panasonic Leica 12-60mm F2.8-4.0 ASPH +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow