Is DPR biased?

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
OP kiwidad Regular Member • Posts: 354
Re: Is DPR biased?

kiwidad wrote:

Reading the

Noticed the X-T3 is criticized for no IBIS!

the phrase "The lack of image stabilization is the main factor you might want to consider in what is otherwise a great all-rounder."

Why isn't this an issue for the reviewer with the Nikon and Canons mentioned costing 3 to 4 times more money?

Ok I am gonna stand down a wee bit here.

It was pointed out the same summary review is used for multiple categories of buying guides so it makes sense something generic in other categories could and did appear in the mini reviews.

Given the magnitude of material DPR produce it stands to reason this would be common to multiple categories and not something I noticed.

If an apology is due I offer one.

I still like the fact the X-T3 has a feature nikon don't offer

 kiwidad's gear list:kiwidad's gear list
Fujifilm X-E2 Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro Fujifilm 50-230mm +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow