Sony RX100 VA vs VI

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
SeeTheWorld
SeeTheWorld Regular Member • Posts: 341
Re: Zoom = good, aperture = ?

MrHollywood wrote:

24-200 is a game changer.

Wildlife, portraits, street, scenic...so many subjects are better served by a lens of this type.

And then there's this: 24mm at 2.8 is still pretty fast glass for a camera that can work nicely at ISO 1600 (with some post) and even 3200 (with more post).

I had a GRII, which is WIDELY regarded as a great available light street camera and it was 2.8 at 28mm (fixed) and was really no better at high ISO than my RX100 M6.

So would 1.8 come in handy? Sure it would. But it's really not going to cost people many shots vs. the HUGE advantages of getting sharp images at 200mm.

Rob

Nice photo!  Our azaleas are just coming out.  Is this recent?  I'm all in with the M6 now.  Thank you!

-- hide signature --

Mary
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world . . ." Margaret Mead

 SeeTheWorld's gear list:SeeTheWorld's gear list
Canon PowerShot D10 Canon PowerShot G5 Canon PowerShot G11 Sony RX10 IV Sony RX100 VI +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow