for all FF BS, fuji told the real story, 1/3 market by value, by unit much lower Locked

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
VideoPic
VideoPic Senior Member • Posts: 1,122
Bob my dear, I thought we had a gentlemen's agreement dear......

bobn2 wrote:

VideoPic wrote:

Mark Ransom wrote:

VideoPic wrote:

Because there are NO standard, anyone can slap an IBIS logo on a camera and claim its like an Olympus camera.........

In reality, no gets close to what Olympus and now Panasonic achieves......

Excuse me?

http://www.cipa.jp/image-stabilization/index_e.html

Huh......????

Let me try to explain.

You said there is no standard.

Mark provided a link to a standard.

I think that means that you were wrong and he was right.

See our fundamental goals visiting this forum differ..... I am pro MFT and like to encourage MFT owners to enjoy, believe in, trust their equipment, hobby, share, plus plus..... You engage in endless tech bla bla to discredit the format and promote FF systems....

Yes I know you have a MFT camera parked somewhere in the garage.......

So the CIPA standard ensures Nikon IBIS or Sony IBIS equals that of the EM1 II or the EM1X........have not seen the tests, data, proof? Oh yes but when I see a IBIS logo I should assume its the same because Bob said so......

-- hide signature --

See my Blog for short articles on the Olympus and Panasonic cameras.
https://myolympusomd.blogspot.com/
Tech developments to wipe sensor size arguments, 3yr death countdown started Jan 2019

 VideoPic's gear list:VideoPic's gear list
Olympus PEN-F Olympus E-M1 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 35-100mm F2.8 OIS +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
NCV
NCV
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow