DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Not interested, but X-T30 shows the way.

Started Feb 14, 2019 | Discussions thread
(unknown member) Forum Pro • Posts: 47,805
Re: Lenses are not a reason.
1

Sorry can’t respond to all as I am on my phone   Thanks for discussing all the points focusing on them - I really appreciate that

the skin smear you talk could very well be silky pix which is what I used for this conversion

Myra the pl 25 f1.4 m43 is ok wide open  it just doesn’t have the old pl 25 of 4/3 quality and imho not the Fuji xf35f2.0 though I would say taking out the sharpness I like some of the overall contrast of it better (but not better than the xf35 f1.4 Fuji)

what I find is the ok 25 m43 becomes quite good stopped down including overall contrast “pop” but the original 4/3 lens did that wide open from the get go

so no, not a bad lens and not what I meant but not what one would think could be

just clarifying that   I still have the old PL and the new one  I was astounded how much “pop” the old one has over the current even if the current is good

-- hide signature --

Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.” - George Orwell

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow