Not interested, but X-T30 shows the way.

Raist3d wrote:

Sion H wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

Sion H wrote:

[]

It’s not that the mft primes are bad it’s that the smaller Fuji primes are better and at the very top Fuji matches best m43 more or less (primes)

basically there isn’t really an advantage in lenses for m43 when you take into account how many overlaps and copies are in mft and how many are that you can scratch as being “not as good as” Both have good lens selection

Just smear some grease over your m43 lenses and you can get them up to the same level as Fuji's f2 primes.

Sure. Seems like you haven't tried them. It's almost the equivalent of an attempt of a personal attack but to the other brand you don't favor

100% crop of XF35 F2.0 @ F2.0. From Raw-Silky Pix.

This photo lacks detail in the eyes - maybe invest in a PL25mm 1.4? and FujI AFS is way behind Panasonic.

Look carefully at the string of hair. It's literally pixels. It's a 100% crop, I can tell you right now the PL25 F1.4 wouldn't do this at F1.4 - which by the way, I have, and it's sub par both to the Fuji XF35 F1.4 and the Original 4/3rds PL 25 F1.4.

I hear theIr cameras do come with free moustache wax though

Sure, keep the denial. I give you the evidence in front of you, but pick on what you want to see

That's exactly what it is... He just got exposed, so he had to fall back to jokes... I have the Fujifilm 35mm f2 and the P/L25mm -and the fuji is easily the better lens, cheaper -and weather resistant.  Smaller too.

-- hide signature --

Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
“The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.” - George Orwell