Not interested, but X-T30 shows the way.

Raist3d wrote:

Jorginho wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

Jorginho wrote:

G1Houston wrote:

When it comes to lenses mFT has shown the way and never fell behind. With some recent additions, the Sigma 56 mm F1.4 from a third party and the 10-25 mm f1.7 to come. The Leica zooms......This is one of the main reasons in my view to go mFTs, not to leave it.

The average fujinlens is better than the average mft lens there’s also many copies of the same ranges but mft does have very goodnlenses too but usually they are big

the small primes in m43 are good but I would say the Fuji xr 35 2.0 small prime is a hit betterao kore these Fuji small primes are all weather sealed Olympus needs to make their small primes weather sealed too- would go perfect with an em5 mkiii

From what I have seen in reviews the primes of mFTs are good (wide open) and small. You have ample choice. They can be large but not necessarily so.

It’s not that the mft primes are bad it’s that the smaller Fuji primes are better and at the very top Fuji matches best m43 more or less (primes)

basically there isn’t really an advantage in lenses for m43 when you take into account how many overlaps and copies are in mft and how many are that you can scratch as being “not as good as” Both have good lens selection

Just smear some grease over your m43 lenses and you can get them up to the same level as Fuji's f2 primes.