DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

$499 RF 35/1.8 have (IS + Macro) but not in a $479 EF-M 32/1.4 (annoying)

Started Feb 7, 2019 | Discussions thread
Abu Mahendra Veteran Member • Posts: 5,312
Re: EF-M 32mm f/1.4 ... comparisons

Jura S wrote:

Marco Nero wrote:

You won't hear the same complaints from the owners of the 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS lens or the 100-400mmL lenses with I.S..

Just to clarify something. 100 L has some weird stabilization unlike most other lenses. It is more alike Tamron VC than native Canon protocol. 100-400 works seamlessly as all other Canon lenses with IS.

And, of course, this is definitely not nit picking. No, siree, the issue of the 100L's IS is central to the thread discussion of M32/1.4 vs. RF35/1.8IS and supremely interesting. No, no nit picking here.

-- hide signature --

>> I'm already lovin' my Canon 35IS lens! <<

 Abu Mahendra's gear list:Abu Mahendra's gear list
Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Ali
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow