DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

$499 RF 35/1.8 have (IS + Macro) but not in a $479 EF-M 32/1.4 (annoying)

Started Feb 7, 2019 | Discussions thread
Jura S Senior Member • Posts: 1,980
Re: EF-M 32mm f/1.4 ... comparisons

Marco Nero wrote:

You won't hear the same complaints from the owners of the 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS lens or the 100-400mmL lenses with I.S..

Just to clarify something. 100 L has some weird stabilization unlike most other lenses. It is more alike Tamron VC than native Canon protocol. 100-400 works seamlessly as all other Canon lenses with IS.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Ali
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow