DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Largely a waste of money

Started Jan 17, 2019 | User reviews thread
OP quadrox Senior Member • Posts: 1,382
Re: Largely a waste of money
3

Rock and Rollei wrote:

fishy wishy wrote:

quadrox wrote:

So yes, that f 2.8 is going to allow you to keep shooting in slightly darker conditions if you are going to shoot wide open, that is undeniable, but it's not much of a difference really.

???

Maybe not for a hobbyist who diddles about in daylight.

If you're an indoor event shooter, having two stops more light can make the world of difference, bringing you from horrible high isos into a usable range.

Two stops is a massive difference to get from a lens. Particularly if you achieve it for only a few hundred.

Your perspective is completely off. Fast apertures are not just about stylistic subtleties for the bored hobbyists.

Not that many indoor event shooters shoot crop. I certainly don't. Those that do are probably shooting primes in most cases anyway.But regardless, that's not "most people".

The OP's contention is that for the majority of people, this lens doesn't make sense. I agree. That certainly doesn't mean that there aren't people for whom this is the perfect lens; clearly there are. Anyone who has to - or wants to - work at f2.8 or even f4 within this focal range will be well served by it. But buy it because you need it, not because everyone tells you it's the best choice on crop - for many, it isn't.

Yes, that expresses very well what I meant to say, thank you!

 quadrox's gear list:quadrox's gear list
Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow