DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Sl2 improved in low light high iso over sl1?

Started Jan 4, 2019 | Questions thread
R2D2 Forum Pro • Posts: 26,551
Re: Sl2 improved in low light high iso over sl1?

Easy Rider wrote:

Yeah I'd say it's about 2/3 of a stop.

But usable ISO 6400 is good enough for me. 3200 is my limit with the 100d.

Played with a 200d in shop today and must say although I'll likely get one anyway, the body and also dials and buttons build quality is not as good as on the 100d.

The 200d just feels cheaper....

Then so do the newer crop Nikons compared to the d5300 and d3300. All the models after them are cheaper feeling and feel more plasticky too..

Whilst Fuji and Sony are making better entry/mid level APSC bodies than they used to, seems CANIKON are doing the opposite.

Still I don't like Sony and cannot afford Fuji prices and prefer an OVF and good battery life all day long, so....

Are you looking at both of the test images at 100%

-- hide signature --

Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries

 R2D2's gear list:R2D2's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R7 +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow