DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Sl2 improved in low light high iso over sl1?

Started Jan 4, 2019 | Questions thread
Easy Rider
OP Easy Rider Veteran Member • Posts: 8,236
Re: Sl2 improved in low light high iso over sl1?

rmexpress22 wrote:

If budget is not an issue, you'd be better-server with the m50 and 22mm EF-m. Light, compact, and good AF.

DPR and DXO typically rate a potato better than a 5D4 and 1Dx2. If you look at the raw samles in DPR, the noise on the SL2 looks similar to other current-gen crop bodies. What looks worse is the sharpness, which I honestly don't understand since under a controller environment with a half-decent lens you'll typically get better results.

False colour noise and sharpness are much worse on sl2 vs Nikon d5500 and Sony a6000 at above iso 1600.  It's about the same as current m43 bodies.

As I said I'll skip it.

Fuji will not disappoint as I previously stated.

Not to you but another poster who suggested I compare photos.  I have done.

I have owned and used a d5300 and fujifilm x100t and they had stellar iso 6400.

I find dpr IQ comparison and dxo to be quite reliable.

I also need a prime 18mm.  Hence fujifilm makes most sense.

Cheers all.

-- hide signature --

When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.
Mark Twain

 Easy Rider's gear list:Easy Rider's gear list
Canon EOS Rebel SL1 Canon EF-S 24mm F2.8 STM Adobe Photoshop CS6 extended Adobe Camera Raw 7
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow