DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Sl2 improved in low light high iso over sl1?

Started Jan 4, 2019 | Questions thread
MikeJ9116 Veteran Member • Posts: 6,958
Re: Sl2 improved in low light high iso over sl1?
1

Easy Rider wrote:

Not as good as my old d5300

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-sl2-eos-200d-review/6

Think I'll skip it

You get much more than low light ISO improvements going from the SL1 to the SL2.  In fact, low light ISO performance is the least reason to upgrade to any APS-C camera from the SL1.  If you are splitting hair this fine then go FF and really get what you want.  Otherwise, Canon, Fuji, Nikon, Sony etc. are all likely to disappoint you in this regard.  Photographers don't choose APS-C when low light ISO performance is important.  The differences between any APS-C cameras you consider regarding high ISO performance will be minimal.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow