Canon 16-35 f/2.8L ii VS Canon 16-35 f/4L IS

Started 1 month ago | Questions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Sumo1250 New Member • Posts: 4
Canon 16-35 f/2.8L ii VS Canon 16-35 f/4L IS

I know there are many threads but each person has different needs, so I want to hear what you guys think based on mine. So...

I'm upgrading to a 6D, and need a wide angle lens. These are my top contenders. My intended needs include; street photography, landscapes, and portraits. I can buy either as they are the same price refurbished, so my only concern is with usability.

I know all the benefits and weaknesses. Weight, corner sharpness, price, etc are not of concern to me. I used the 24mm 2.8 on my crop 7D a lot and love shooting it wide open, don't know if I want to swap that for IS. I'm going more towards the f/4 since it is newer and I can find barely used models whereas the 2.8 is a bit older.

What do you think?

 Sumo1250's gear list:Sumo1250's gear list
Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 700D Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM +2 more
ANSWER:
This question has not been answered yet.
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 7D
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow